Dear Customer, we will be closed for the holidays from December 25th until January 2nd. Make sure to place your orders before December 18th!

My Cart

loader
Loading...

Architecture and Ugliness


  • Bloomsbury Academic
  • by Wouter Van Acker, Thomas Mical
Whatever 'ugliness' is, it remains a problematic category in architectural aesthetics - alternately vilified and appropriated, either to shock or to invert conventions of architecture. This book presents eighteen new essays which rethink ugliness in architecture - from brutalism to eclectic postmodern architectural productions - and together offer a diverse reappraisal of the history and theory of postmodern architecture and design.

ISBN 9781350068230 | E | HB
€112,00
at this moment not in stock
Quantity
More Information
Publisher Bloomsbury Academic
ISBN 9781350068230
Author(s) Wouter Van Acker, Thomas Mical
Publication date January 2020
Edition Hardback
Dimensions mm
Language(s) Eng. ed.
Description

Whatever 'ugliness' is, it remains a problematic category in architectural aesthetics - alternately vilified and appropriated, either to shock or to invert conventions of architecture. This book presents eighteen new essays which rethink ugliness in architecture - from brutalism to eclectic postmodern architectural productions - and together offer a diverse reappraisal of the history and theory of postmodern architecture and design. The essays address both broad theoretical questions on ugliness and postmodern aesthetics, as well as more specific analyses of significant architectural examples dating from the last decades of the twentieth century, addressing the relation between the aesthetic register of ugliness and aesthetic concepts such as brutalism, kitsch, the formless, ad hoc-ism, the monstrous, or the grotesque. The aim of this volume is not simply to document the history of a postmodern anti-aesthetic through case studies. Instead, it aims to shed light on an aesthetic problem that has been largely overlooked in the agenda of architectural theory, the question if and how ugliness can be of interest to architecture; or if and how architecture can make good use of ugliness.