Dear Customer, we will be closed for the holidays from December 25th until January 2nd. Make sure to place your orders before December 18th!

My Cart

loader
Loading...

Who Owns This Sentence? A History of Copyrights and Wrongs


  • Headline (Hachette)
  • by David Bellos, Alexandre Montagu
Copyright is everywhere. Your smartphone incorporates thousands of items of intellectual property. Someone owns the reproduction rights to photographs of your dining table. At this very moment, battles are raging over copyright in the output of artificial intelligence programs. Not only books but wallpaper, computer programs and cuddly toys are now deemed to be intellectual properties - making copyright a labyrinthine construction of laws covering almost all products of human creativity.

ISBN 9781800699144 | EN | PB
€21,95
available
Quantity
More Information
Publisher Headline (Hachette)
ISBN 9781800699144
Author(s) David Bellos, Alexandre Montagu
Publication date January 2024
Edition Paperback
Dimensions 236 x 163 mm
Pages 384
Language(s) English ed.
Description

Copyright is everywhere. Your smartphone incorporates thousands of items of intellectual property. Someone owns the reproduction rights to photographs of your dining table. At this very moment, battles are raging over copyright in the output of artificial intelligence programs. Not only books but wallpaper, computer programs and cuddly toys are now deemed to be intellectual properties - making copyright a labyrinthine construction of laws covering almost all products of human creativity. Copyright has its roots in eighteenth-century London, where it was first established to limit printers' control of books. Principled arguments against copyright arose from the start and nearly abolished it in the nineteenth century. But a handful of little-noticed changes in the late twentieth century concentrated ownership of immaterial goods into very few hands. Who Owns This Sentence? is an often-humorous and always-enlightening cultural, legal, and global history of the idea that intangible things can be owned, and makes a persuasive case for seeing copyright as an engine of inequality in the twenty-first century.